Grant Strategy 8 min read

What reviewers actually look for in competitive grant proposals

Funded proposals don't just sound good - they read like executable plans. Here's a practical, reviewer-first breakdown you can apply before you draft.

Work with us

By The Grant Ship

Strategy - Writing - Budgets & Compliance

Clarity, structure, and reviewer-ready flow.

Most proposals fail for one reason: they make reviewers work too hard to understand what will happen, who will do it, and why the budget is justified. Funded proposals reduce ambiguity - they make the plan feel inevitable.

Rule: Every paragraph should either (1) clarify the plan, (2) justify feasibility, or (3) strengthen alignment.

The reviewer's mental checklist

Reviewers often read quickly. They're scanning for structure: scope, outcomes, methods, team capability, evaluation, and a budget that matches the work. Your job is to make these items visible without forcing them to hunt.

  • Fit: Is this clearly aligned to the solicitation's goals and priorities?
  • Feasibility: Does the team, timeline, and approach feel realistic?
  • Impact: Are outcomes measurable and meaningful?
  • Risk: Are challenges acknowledged with mitigation?
  • Budget logic: Does the budget match the plan line-by-line?
Make the plan visible: headings, bullets, and clear flow reduce reviewer fatigue.

Clarity beats complexity

Complexity can exist in the project - it shouldn't exist in the writing. Strong proposals translate complexity into simple, accountable steps. Use short sections, direct language, and consistent naming for activities and outcomes.

"Your proposal should feel like the minutes from a meeting where decisions were made."

Alignment: narrative <-> workplan <-> budget

If one piece drifts, reviewers lose trust. The safest pattern is a tight triangle:

Narrative

What you will do - and why it works.

Workplan

How it happens - activities, outputs, timeline.

Budget

What it costs - directly tied to activities.

Micro-technique

Reuse the same labels (Activity 1, Activity 2...) across narrative, timeline, and budget notes. It creates instant reviewer confidence.

Evidence, not adjectives

Replace "innovative" with proof: pilot results, partner capacity, baseline data, prior outcomes, or clear rationale grounded in literature and field practice. Evidence makes the plan believable.

Evidence can be simple: baseline metrics, past outputs, partner commitments, or pilots.

A simple self-review before submission

Before you submit, pretend you're a reviewer who's reading at speed. Can you answer these in under 60 seconds?

Want help turning your plan into a reviewer-ready submission?

We'll help you build structure, alignment, and clarity - then deliver a clean, compliant package.

Contact The Grant Ship